Samiksha's State of the Debate

Samiksha's State of the Debate

The Progressive Case for Pro-Life: Why I Changed My Mind

The Left’s selective science, and why protecting life is the only common-sense position left.

Freddie Alexander's avatar
Samiksha Bhattacharjee's avatar
Freddie Alexander and Samiksha Bhattacharjee
Dec 27, 2025
∙ Paid

The selective ethics of the Left

by Freddie Alexander, our new culture contributor

One of the strangest things about the left is how selectively they apply their ethical principles.

  • On Monday, it’s “listen to the science.”

  • On Tuesday, it’s “every life matters.”

  • On Wednesday, it’s “how dare you question animal suffering.”

But mention unborn human life and suddenly science is “complicated,” life is “contextual,” and suffering only counts if the being experiencing it can protest on social media. It’s just hypocrisy.

a group of women holding signs and wearing masks
Photo by Manny Becerra on Unsplash

Take animal welfare. I actually agree with a lot of it.

Factory farming is brutal. Causing unnecessary suffering to sentient creatures is morally wrong. Fine.

But you can’t argue, straight-faced, that a chicken’s pain demands moral urgency while a developing human life is dismissed as disposable tissue.

You can’t tell me a calf deserves legal protection while a baby weeks away from birth is framed as an inconvenience.

If suffering matters, it matt…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Samiksha Bhattacharjee.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
Freddie Alexander's avatar
A guest post by
Freddie Alexander
© 2026 Samiksha's State of the Debate · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture